Not one, but two Federal courts on the same day declared that abortionists can still partially deliver a live healthy baby feet first while leaving the baby's head inside the mother, jam scissors into the base of the skull, insert a tube and then suck out the brains of a perfectly healthy human.
Here's a diagram on the above description of a Partial birth abortion in case you can't even visualize such a thing would ever take place.
Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt wrote, "We are reluctant to invalidate an entire statute," "However, after considering all of the obstacles to our devising a narrower remedy, we conclude that such is our obligation."
Yes, such is your obligation to continue to allow humans to practice infanticide legally. We know that you're reluctant, but its your obligation.
I would like to curse now.
@#$% *&^% @#$%& (*&^) @#%$& (*&()*_^^%^*
Dissenter Chester J. Straub said, "Allowing a physician to destroy a child as long as one toe remains within the mother would place society on the path towards condoning infanticide," he said. He added: "I find the current expansion of the right to terminate a pregnancy to cover a child in the process of being born morally, ethically and legally unacceptable."
On the path towards condoning infanticide? On the path???? How long must you walk down a path before you determine that your walking on it? If you haven't already made the determination that we have been walking on the path of condoning infanticide for thirty three years now, you will never see the asphalt for the road. Straub goes on to say that he "..finds the current expansion of the right to terminate a pregnancy. Morally, ethically and legally unacceptable." I can almost hear him saying, "..as long as you don't partially deliver the baby first, well then it's Ok with me, but this is just too much." It's the ole 'out of site out of mind' mentality. I probably shouldn't be so harsh with the only dissenter, but jeez.
God help us.
Freedom
3 years ago